-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 811
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix/delete read only remnants folders #7061
Conversation
d55760d
to
8111dd3
Compare
@nextcloud/designers can you help with the UI review ? 🙏 |
06901c9
to
411c0bd
Compare
@mgallien you mean review of this popup dialog? Are those windows standard components? |
yes the popup screenshot would show the message @marcoambrosini I am more concerned by the content of the message and if you have suggestions about it |
Got it @mgallien, I have to admit I don't understand exactly what's going on there. Could you explain the context with a bit more detail so that I can help with the text? :) |
/backport to stable-3.14 |
/backport to stable-3.13 |
@marcoambrosini |
abd7fc0
to
ccb33bb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we now detect them and ask the user confirmation before cleaning them up
not cleaning them is causing synchronization errors so the user would probably care and look at the dialog when it pops up
@mgallien @claucambra @camilasan in these cases we should automatically clear it up. Reading this popup I only see possible confusion, and no reason to not click the "Remove remnant folders" button.
We need to do as many things as possible automatically. Every time we ask people something, it can:
- Be missed
- Be misunderstood
- Lead to confusion
- Lead to frustration why it’s not understandable
- etc.
(Similar thing with the "spaces at end of filenames" issue for example.)
Do you think we can perform this action without asking once we detect that folders that should have been deleted are in fact still there? cc @jancborchardt edit: just saw your comment after refreshing Jan :) |
@jancborchardt |
ccb33bb
to
6407997
Compare
you can review again |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there is no dialog, all good from my side. :) Thanks @mgallien!
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]>
will enable implementation of other ways to interrupt sync after discovery to get user feedback Signed-off-by: Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]>
users should then notice that the sync errors are gone Signed-off-by: Matthieu Gallien <[email protected]>
6407997
to
8faefc6
Compare
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions See analysis details on SonarCloud Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint |
AppImage file: nextcloud-PR-7061-8faefc6fa28d9a4bf956ec074cc6f9b60975eb88-x86_64.AppImage |
No description provided.